BOS welcomes new clarity around risks posed by online aligner companies

30 January 2017
Volume 31 · Issue 6

The legal and ethical challenges confronted by dentists who are asked to carry out limited aspects of treatment on behalf of an online orthodontic provider are set out in a new risk management article from Dental Protection.

Richard George, director of external relations for the BOS, welcomed the advice in the latest issue of Dental Protection’s publication, Riskwise. He said, “This article brings great clarity. The dentist who is tempted to sub-contract for a third party, especially an online provider who has never met the patient, is taking a risk.”

Yvonne Shaw, dento-legal adviser at Dental Protection, highlights how dentists who are asked either to carry out interproximal reduction (IPR) or to fit aligners may be compromised if there are difficulties down the line.

She states, “Internationally this has been a growing concern with dentists being asked by companies to undertake limited aspects of the treatment plan provided to the patient, including IPR and initial fitting of aligners.”

“It would not be surprising,” she says, “if the patient held the dentist responsible if problems arise because they would believe that the dentist endorsed the treatment.”

She goes on to set out the steps that a dentist who is sub-contracted to carry out aspects of treatment would have to take in order to protect themselves either from litigation or from the General Dental Council.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Dentist. To read more, please register. Registration to the-dentist.co.uk allows you to enjoy the following benefits:

WHAT’S INCLUDED

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, articles and video content

  • Monthly email newsletter

  • Podcasts and members benefits, coming soon!