Dramatic improvement in children’s teeth but Scotland still lags behind

16 November 2016
Volume 31 · Issue 6

The British Dental Association is pleased to see children’s dental health in Scotland improve by 24 per cent since 2000, with new data that shows more than two thirds (69 per cent) of five year olds have no obvious signs of tooth decay.

The BDA welcomes the progress made but is disappointed that the figures from the National Dental Inspection Programme also reveal a huge gap between five year olds from more affluent areas and those from the lowest income households. Only 55 per cent from the most deprived areas are free from tooth decay compared with 82 per cent from the least deprived.
 
Despite the overall improvement in children’s dental health, Scotland still lags behind countries of similar development, such as England and Norway. Comparable figures show that two thirds (75 per cent) of five year olds in England are decay free, with broadly similar figures for Norway (73-86 per cent).
 
Robert Donald, chair of the BDA’s Scottish Dental Practice Committee, said: “Scotland is leading the way in investing in children’s dental health. The huge improvement we have seen in youngsters’ teeth since the millennium is testament to investing in an early years’ prevention scheme, which operates in our nurseries and schools. Undoubtedly, ChildSmile has saved many young children from distress, days out of education and ultimately avoidable dental treatment. 
 
“However, despite this improvement Scotland is still playing catch up with our neighbour south of the border, so there is no scope for standing still. There is no escaping either the fact that far too many children from our most disadvantaged communities still bear the burden of tooth decay, a largely preventable disease. 
 
“Government ministers must continue to invest in ChildSmile, to tackle this unacceptable inequality in dental health. The BDA has also called on the Scottish government to expand the ChildSmile programme to five to 12 year olds and we have championed wide ranging action on sugar, including taxation, public education and marketing, and for proceeds from the sugar levy to be directed into oral health initiatives.”