When most people think of ferocious, blade-like teeth on prehistoric creatures they picture Smilodon, better known as the saber-toothed tiger. But in the world of dinosaurs, theropods are well known for having blade-like teeth with serrated cutting edges used for biting and ripping their prey. And until recently, the complex arrangement of tissues that gave rise to these terrifying teeth was considered unique to these meat-eating dinosaurs.
In a paper published December 16 in Biology Letters, Dr Aaron LeBlanc, Marie Curie postdoctoral fellow at the Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences at King’s College London, together with researchers from Harvard University, the University of Toronto and the University of Manitoba, examined thin fossil slices of gorgonopsians’ teeth and discovered similar complex arrangement of tissues that made the steak-knife-like serrations in theropods.
Gorgonopsians are a group of synapsids from the middle-late Permian 270 to 252 million years ago. These animals, like other synapsids, are considered to be the forerunners of mammals and fall within the lineage that eventually gave rise to mammals.
“Palaeontologists can tell a lot about the diets of extinct animals by looking at the shapes of their teeth, and gorgonopsians had some impressive teeth to study” said Aaron LeBlanc.
“These animals were the apex predators of their day and are characterized by their sabre-like canines that could extend up to 13cm long,” said Megan Whitney from Harvard.
Previous studies of theropod dinosaurs uncovered a complex arrangement of tissues made of both enamel and dentine that formed the serrations on their teeth. This complex arrangement was considered unique to theropod dinosaurs. But no one had ever made a thin section of a gorgonopsian tooth before to examine the serrations.
Inspired, LeBlanc and co-authors combined their expertise in paleohistology (the study of the microstructure of fossilized skeletal tissues) and examined thin sections of fossils from three synapsids from three different time periods to test a theory of the structure of the serrations in this group. “We were surprised to find theropod-like serrations in gorgonopsians,” said Megan Whitney from Harvard. “We wanted to see how other carnivorous synapsids had made their serrations, so we looked at an older synapsid (Dimetrodon) and a younger, mammalian synapsid (Smilodon).”
Gorgonopsians, Dimetrodon, and Smilodon are all synapsids and like theropods were apex predators of their day and had serrated, knife-like teeth (ziphodonty). Dimetrodon is one of the earliest synapsids from the Cisuralian period around 295 to 272 million years ago; Dimetrodon is often mistakenly described as a dinosaur. Smilodon lived in the Americas during the Pleistocene epoch 2.5 million years ago to 10,000 years ago.
“All of these animals fall along the mammal-line which is divergent from the reptile line with dinosaurs,” said LeBlanc. “In fact, these three animals are more closely related to humans than to dinosaurs.”
The thin sections revealed that the gorgonopsian serrations are composed of tightly packed denticles made of both enamel and dentine, the same complex arrangement of tissues that had previously been attributed to theropod dinosaurs and considered unique to them.
“What’s surprising is that the type of serrations in gorgonopsians are more like those of the meat-eating dinosaurs from the Mesozoic era,” said LeBlanc. “It means that this unique type of cutting tooth evolved first in the lineage leading to mammals, only to later evolve independently in dinosaurs.”
“The fact that we only see this type of serration evolve in meat-eating animals is significant,” said co-author Kirstin Brink from the University of Manitoba. “The tiny microstructures hidden inside the teeth offer a significant advantage to the tooth, strengthening the serrations and helping them last longer in the mouth, which in turn helps the animal eat efficiently.”
Though gorgonopsians share this trait with theropod dinosaurs, they actually share more characteristics with other synapsids like Dimetrodon and humans. “These animals converged on a similar tooth serration morphology because of the functional benefits, not because they’re close relatives to one another,” said Whitney. “In this case, it probably has something to do with the fact that animals were really putting a lot of wear and tear on their teeth. And so independently they've been able to form a serration that is going to withstand the repeated forces needed to eat because eating is important. So, there's a lot of selection acting on teeth.”
Gorgonopsians were a diverse group with body sizes that ranged from the size of a medium-sized dog to a bear and Whitney notes that although the specimens sampled had this type of morphology, it remains possible that there is a diversity of serration types that would match the diversity of gorgonopsians.